Themes, Fist Of Fire and Birthright are very good, rest of the songs varies from ok to awful (Teakbois).
Themes, Fist Of Fire and Birthright are very good, rest of the songs varies from ok to awful (Teakbois).
My progressive music site: https://pienemmatpurot.com/ Reviews in English: https://pienemmatpurot.com/in-english/
It's just another Yes album for me. I file it under 'Y'. It has all the pretentiousness and over-polish of every other Yes album of that decade. Couldn't care less about the title.
Some very exciting Howe moments at the end of Themes. That section (a sneaky rhythmic augmentation of the opening riff from Changes) is one of my very favorite Yes instrumental moments. And it's the only place I know of where you can hear Bruford play a two-step. The lyrics are Anderson's version of "Death on Two Legs." I LOVE this song and it belongs on any Best of Yes compilation I'd make for myself. But then, I feel that way about Future Times/Rejoice, too.
I adore Quartet and totally understand why others don't.
Brother of Mine was the lead-off promo and I hated it at the time but later warmed up to it nicely. Now I kind of go "Awwww" in a heartwarming way every time it starts.
Order of the Universe is the big misstep of the album for me. Silly, lame rock posturing and an uninteresting stretch of music with an obnoxious chorus I can't stand. I actually rate it below Teakbois.
I like Chris Kimsey's production, clear and clean, fresh off Misplaced Childhood.
This album suffers from the problem of bands feeling they needed to produce too much material for an album in the recently arrived CD era. Shave off 15 or 20 minutes of the worst stuff and it's a pretty good album.
My progressive music site: https://pienemmatpurot.com/ Reviews in English: https://pienemmatpurot.com/in-english/
I remember when me and my musical partner at the time saw Brother Of Mine on MTV. We had no idea these guys had gotten together and made an album, and we were elated, thrilled. Of course, we tempered these feelings when we actually heard the thing. At the time, we still thought it was pretty darn good. Now though, I agree with others who say it hasn't aged well. I don't even own the studio album anymore, just the live album (which I still think is pretty darn good.......except for Bruford's annoying electronic snare that dominates nearly every song).
The biggest disappointment was that they were going to do another album.......but then the abomination that was Union happened instead. Bruford was excited (Bruford!!! excited!!) about the prospect of doing a second ABWH album. The proceeding Union album and tour killed any interest he had in the Yes brand. Sad. It would have been interesting to see what they would have come up with as a solid unit (what appeared on Union was just a pale shadow of what might have been........at least that's what Bruford and Wakeman thought).
Rock gives courage? (or whatever) Seriously?
Good album - great tour.
My fav has always been The Meeting - lovely piece!
ahem...
Soooooo............. . . . . . . . .
Give my all the drugs you have...
Never be afraid....
to share you stash.
Soooooo... OH oh oh....
Give me all the drugs YOU HAVE!!!!
There is a special doobie..... a special doobie...............
lol thos
Long lost, buddage of mine
smokin' the jibs for the first time...
The drugs are there!
and you brain is that one special reason!!!
Interviewer of reprobate ne'er-do-well musicians of the long-haired rock n' roll persuasion at: www.velvetthunder.co.uk and former scribe at Classic Rock Society. Only vaguely aware of anything other than music.
*** Join me in the Garden of Delights for 4 hours of tune-spinning... every Saturday at 5pm EST on Deep Nuggets radio! www.deepnuggets.com ***
For all the criticisms of this album, many of which I agree with, I ask myself, "why do I like this album better than any Yes-related project released since Drama?" (The possible exception being Howe's Turbulence, which suffers from many of the same problems as ABWH).
I have two answers. The first is the rhythms. Yes, the drum sounds suck, but the rhythmic approach is a breath of fresh air in a sea of neo-disco. At least it was to me at the time, and to some degree still is true. Electronic drums or no, Bruford breathed life into this stuff, and that still shines through despite the awful 80s sounds. It separates this music from 90125 and other YesWest stuff in my mind.
The second aspect is ambition. Is it 70s ambition? No. But at least it at times nods substantially in that direction. Again, a breath of fresh air in a time when it seemed that music was getting more and more packaged to suit the mainstream pop sensibilities. This album, flawed as it was, at least acknowledged that there was something more to Yes' sound than what we got from 90125 and Big Generator.
It resonated with me then, and despite all my instincts to the contrary, it still does. To me, it's a shame they couldn't maintain this quality level on subsequent albums.
Bill
Bookmarks