Results 1 to 16 of 16

Thread: Let it Be on Disney+

  1. #1

    Let it Be on Disney+

    Anyone watch this? Is it "cleaned" up? I still have the original I downloaded years ago. Curious what if any changes Peter Jackson made to it.

  2. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Kalamazoo Michigan
    Posts
    10,551
    Quote Originally Posted by happytheman View Post
    Anyone watch this? Is it "cleaned" up? I still have the original I downloaded years ago. Curious what if any changes Peter Jackson made to it.
    I never saw the original film. Having watched the entire 8 hour Peter Jackson film, is there any reason to also watch this one?

  3. #3
    It is cleaned up and looks and sounds fantastic. Jackson did not change anything, the content is that of the original film. Funnily, it is so short (82 minutes) that it almost seems like a Get Back trailer!
    Much less of a 'downer' than l recall. I had not seen it since 1976.
    It does include the 3-song set they did live in the studio of Two Of Us, Let It Be, and The Long And Winding Road (where they have dressed nicely and play through all 3 songs). I don't believe these are included in their entirety in Get Back.
    Worth watching if only for that.

  4. #4
    As a criticism l would add that the direction is completely amateurish, the film completely lacks a narrative. It does not establish where they are (Twickenham), why they are there (to rehearse for a live performance), why they are suddenly somewhere else (Apple Studios), why Billy Preston is suddenly there, how they end up on the roof, etc.
    The popular opinion is that this was never re-released because it is a sad portrait of The Beatles disintegrating. Maybe it was really because it was just a bad piece of filmmaking?
    If you were not up on your Beatles history, or had not seen Get Back, you would have no bloody idea what is going on.

  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by happytheman View Post
    Anyone watch this? Is it "cleaned" up? I still have the original I downloaded years ago. Curious what if any changes Peter Jackson made to it.
    Quote Originally Posted by SteveSly View Post
    I never saw the original film. Having watched the entire 8 hour Peter Jackson film, is there any reason to also watch this one?
    Sure.

    Quote Originally Posted by veteranof1000psychicwars View Post
    It does include the 3-song set they did live in the studio of Two Of Us, Let It Be, and The Long And Winding Road (where they have dressed nicely and play through all 3 songs). I don't believe these are included in their entirety in Get Back.
    Worth watching if only for that.
    ^^THIS!

    Yes, the session from the day after the rooftop was suspiciously missing from "Get Back," which had us all expecting the movie release. And there was really very little overlap, aside from the rooftop performance.

    Quote Originally Posted by veteranof1000psychicwars View Post
    The popular opinion is that this was never re-released because it is a sad portrait of The Beatles disintegrating.
    Yes, The Beatles themselves held up the rerelease all these years.
    "The White Zone is for loading and unloading only. If you got to load or unload go to the White Zone!"

  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by ronmac View Post
    Yes, The Beatles themselves held up the rerelease all these years.
    Yes that is completely true, and Ringo's opinion of it has not changed.

  7. #7
    Jazzbo manqué Mister Triscuits's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Utopia
    Posts
    5,733
    I haven’t seen the Disney version yet, but I’ve heard that it brightens up the gloomy lighting of the original.
    Hurtleturtled Out of Heaven - an electronic music composition, on CD and vinyl
    https://michaelpdawson.bandcamp.com
    http://www.waysidemusic.com/Music-Pr...MCD-spc-7.aspx

  8. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by veteranof1000psychicwars View Post
    As a criticism l would add that the direction is completely amateurish, the film completely lacks a narrative. It does not establish where they are (Twickenham), why they are there (to rehearse for a live performance), why they are suddenly somewhere else (Apple Studios), why Billy Preston is suddenly there, how they end up on the roof, etc.
    The popular opinion is that this was never re-released because it is a sad portrait of The Beatles disintegrating. Maybe it was really because it was just a bad piece of filmmaking?
    If you were not up on your Beatles history, or had not seen Get Back, you would have no bloody idea what is going on.
    Keep in mind that the whole idea was to capture the magic happening on film. They wanted to get The Beatles in the studio "to see what would happen." Unfortunately, as the critics said, nothing did.

    I'm not suggesting it's good filmmaking. I agree it needed some narrative.
    "The White Zone is for loading and unloading only. If you got to load or unload go to the White Zone!"

  9. #9
    That's Mr. to you, Sir!! Trane's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    in a cosmic jazzy-groove around Brussels
    Posts
    6,418
    Quote Originally Posted by veteranof1000psychicwars View Post
    As a criticism l would add that the direction is completely amateurish, the film completely lacks a narrative. It does not establish where they are (Twickenham), why they are there (to rehearse for a live performance), why they are suddenly somewhere else (Apple Studios), why Billy Preston is suddenly there, how they end up on the roof, etc.
    The popular opinion is that this was never re-released because it is a sad portrait of The Beatles disintegrating. Maybe it was really because it was just a bad piece of filmmaking?
    If you were not up on your Beatles history, or had not seen Get Back, you would have no bloody idea what is going on.
    I'm still waiting for my buddy to remember to lend me his Get Back package, but I have no qualms for not understanding the LIB context, though I'm sure Get Back will add much to LIB.

    Quote Originally Posted by Mister Triscuits View Post
    I haven’t seen the Disney version yet, but I’ve heard that it brightens up the gloomy lighting of the original.
    I'd say that the crowds inside the movie house had a very lousy attitude towards LIB, including hissing as soon as Yoko was on the screen (I saw the film twice in the late 70's midnight Friday seances in local theatres).
    True enough the film is not really satisfying in terms of explaining the context, but outside the others spectators' attitudes, I didn't see LIB as "depressing".

    Quote Originally Posted by ronmac View Post
    Keep in mind that the whole idea was to capture the magic happening on film. They wanted to get The Beatles in the studio "to see what would happen." Unfortunately, as the critics said, nothing did.
    much like Magical Mystery Tour, really!!
    my music collection increased tenfolds when I switched from drug-addicts to complete nutcases.

  10. #10
    Quote Originally Posted by ronmac View Post
    Keep in mind that the whole idea was to capture the magic happening on film. They wanted to get The Beatles in the studio "to see what would happen." Unfortunately, as the critics said, nothing did.
    I'm not suggesting it's good filmmaking. I agree it needed some narrative.
    Lindsey-Hogg did have the brief that he was filming the band rehearsing songs for a film or TV special culminating in a live concert at the end. It is not necessary now, but before the film was released he could have merely added captions to the beginning and in transitional scenes, like "The band decides to resume rehearsals in their own studio at Savile Row", and "Having abandoned the idea of a special live concert, they decide to do an impromptu concert on the roof at Savile Row", etc.
    Again, we don't need them now since we have a the historical perspective but at the time l think that was something that should have been added to give it some kind of narrative structure.

  11. #11
    Quote Originally Posted by Mister Triscuits View Post
    I haven’t seen the Disney version yet, but I’ve heard that it brightens up the gloomy lighting of the original.
    The main reason the original release looked so lousy was because it was shot in 16mm and subsequently blown up to 35mm to show in theaters, giving it that dark, grainy quality. This new version retains its 'filmic' quality and looks terrific.
    It really is worth watching on its own merits.

  12. #12
    Quote Originally Posted by Trane View Post
    much like Magical Mystery Tour, really!!
    Their first sign of fallibility. The fact that it was broadcast in B&W didn't help matters.
    "The White Zone is for loading and unloading only. If you got to load or unload go to the White Zone!"

  13. #13
    Actually l think it would be great if Peter Jackson turned his hand to restoring Magical Mystery Tour. I have it on an old VHS release that was made from a terrible print of the film, complete with pops and scratches in the film and shoddy audio. I would think McCartney would be agreeable to that.

  14. #14
    Jazzbo manqué Mister Triscuits's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Utopia
    Posts
    5,733
    Quote Originally Posted by veteranof1000psychicwars View Post
    Actually l think it would be great if Peter Jackson turned his hand to restoring Magical Mystery Tour. I have it on an old VHS release that was made from a terrible print of the film, complete with pops and scratches in the film and shoddy audio. I would think McCartney would be agreeable to that.
    As long as he takes the censorship bar out of the striptease scene.
    Hurtleturtled Out of Heaven - an electronic music composition, on CD and vinyl
    https://michaelpdawson.bandcamp.com
    http://www.waysidemusic.com/Music-Pr...MCD-spc-7.aspx

  15. #15
    Quote Originally Posted by Mister Triscuits View Post
    As long as he takes the censorship bar out of the striptease scene.
    Yes! Surely he would...?

  16. #16
    Member Munster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Location
    Deepest Surrey, UK
    Posts
    888
    I haven’t seen this film – Paul McCartney and Wings: One Hand Clapping - mentioned on any thread here, but it seems well worth seeing. Presumably it will end up on a streaming service at some point.

    https://www.theguardian.com/film/202...-pure-pleasure
    We walked arm in arm with madness, and every little breeze whispered of the secret love we had for our disease (P. Blegvad)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •