Renate, I am not sure if you were rebuking me, but I will admit your opening comment caught me off guard. I am trying to make the point that for a lot of people- my kids, for example- music goes on while they do homework with their kids, or prepare dinner, or do whatever it is they need done in a family- and that is all it is. So long as they have the music, what the music is is a secondary consideration. And y'know what? That's how they consume it. Spotify. They do not purchase music by individual artists, ever. And frankly, I listen to music from the time I get up to the time I go to bed, whether I am working or- as the case is now, since I retired 2 weeks ago- or not working. It is always there, curated by me depending on what I am in the mood for. Which I suppose is not really the point of Beato's mini-tirade. It is about solo artists v. bands, and bands are losing, for sure.OK Boomer.
You never listened to the radio, or to an album while doing your homework?
And well, now there are other things people can do for their entertainment, like videogames (which I think all have music).
Of course, people have more choices now. My grandkids watch video clips. My kids (who are 44- twins- and 39) listen while taking care of the family. But they do not follow music as I did when I was younger, when we followed the release of LPs like hawks, recorded them off the radio, etc. There isn't an artist who they would care released a new record or whatever we call it these days. Only my hipster 39yo has albums, which he plays on his fancy stereo with blue tooth.
Bookmarks